West Virginia Rules DFS Game of Experience; No it’s Not, Says Delaware
Delaware AG Matthew Denn’s opinion it is the fact that DFS is just a not a game of ability. At least, it isn’t the means we play it!
West Virginia and Delaware are two states that have no plans to legalize daily dream sports in the near future, as well as for two completely different reasons. Two attorneys general, 400 miles apart, have actually demonstrated two completely different opinions on the legality associated with the contests over yesteryear days that are few.
On West Virginia’s AG ruled that there was no need to legalize DFS because it was prominently a game of skill and therefore perfectly legal under West Virginia law monday.
‘We read state legislation to prohibit just betting upon games decided at minimum predominantly by chance,’ penned Morrisey in his opinion. But DFS, he said ‘are determined predominantly by skill, knowledge, and athletic performance.’
A matter for the legislature whether West Virginia will now move to regulate and tax the DFS industry, as its neighbor Virginia became the first US state to do at the beginning of the year, is of course.
Delaware Pulls the Plug
In stark contrast, Delaware pulled the plug on DFS week that is last with its AG, Matthew Denn, ruling, perhaps more controversially, that the contests were virtually games of chance.
‘Relying in the Delaware Constitution, as well as State and Federal case law, DOJ attorneys determined that online fantasy contests that incorporate payment for playing and monetary rewards constitute gambling because possibility, as opposed to skill, could be the dominant element in the results of these contests,’ said Denn.
‘The most participants that are skilled lose and less skilled participants might win because of exactly what actually occurs during the real-life game. In other words, real-life players are individual and human behavior is unpredictable.
‘While it’s recognized that certain individuals may use their particular recreations knowledge in selecting their fantasy players and otherwise participating such contests, that factor alone will not make the contests games of skill.’
Precursor to Regulation?
Denn said that he had written cease and desist letters to DFS sites running in Delaware, including DraftKings, FanDuel and Yahoo. There has been no formal statement from any operator on the situation, nor any indication of whether they mean to comply.
Needless to say, the AG’s ruling would not preclude the legislature from passing a law to legalize and regulate DFS as time goes by; indeed, similar rulings from DA’s in other states have proved to be a catalyst for the passing such legislation, as was the case in Tennessee and Mississippi earlier this year.
A bill to control DFS was introduced into the Delaware House at zero hour at the end of the legislative session on 30 June, but could was too late be pushed through.
‘Our company is sure many Delaware residents and visitors would enjoy participating into the full array of fantasy activities competitions, including the ones that require payment for participation and have cash prizes,’ concluded Genn. ‘But until such contests can be provided legally, the DOJ must enforce the law.’
RAWA Champion Chaffetz Grills AG Lynch, While Sanders Shocks with Clinton Endorsement
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) was back at it on Capitol Hill this week, as the congressman continues to need answers concerning the FBI’s recommendation to the Department of Justice (DOJ) not to prosecute Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton.
On July 6, FBI Director James Comey said Clinton’s use of an email that is private while serving as secretary of state ended up being careless, but did not warrant unlawful costs.
US Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) seen here at an earlier hearing with the FBI’s James Comey, grilled AG Loretta Lynch at a House Judiciary Commitee hearing on Tuesday in regards to the legalities surrounding Hillary Clinton’s claims about her email server that is private usage. Lynch largely avoided taking any stance whatsoever, visibly irritating Chaffetz. Representative Elijah Cummings (D- Maryland) sits to Chaffetz’ right. (Image: J. Scott Applewhite/AP)
Chaffetz is Las Vegas Sands Chairman Sheldon Adelson’s right-hand man in Congress. The representative introduced the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) in the homely house to coincide with Sen. Lindsey Graham’s (R-South Carolina) legislation in the Senate.
RAWA seeks to replace the Wire Act to its pre-2011 interpretation. Five years ago, the DOJ issued an opinion saying the Wire Act applied just to online sports wagering, effectively opening states to legalize Internet casinos.
Chaffetz believes the DOJ had no right to unilaterally overhaul federal law. He also doesn’t believe the department is being candid in exactly how it’s responding to Comey’s findings.
Pleading the Fifth
The morning after his agency recommended no charges against Clinton for storing emails that are classified non-secure servers, Comey came across with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, of which Chaffetz is the chairman.
As he did with Comey, Chaffetz did his best to take full advantage of the five minutes he had with Attorney General Loretta Lynch on Tuesday although he didn’t have the luxury of as much interview time. As AG, Lynch is theoretically Comey’s boss, while the FBI is just a division for the DOJ.
But Lynch deflected one question after another, much towards the chagrin of the Utah congressman. The AG avoided giving specific answers to Chaffetz’ ongoing assault of ‘Is it legal or illegal?’
‘ Is it legal or illegal to talk about classified information with somebody would youn’t have a security approval?’ the congressman asked Lynch. ‘Is it legal or illegal to provide access to someone who does not have the prerequisite security clearance to see classified material? Could it be legal or illegal to keep, house, or retain classified information in a non-secure location?’
Whenever Lynch consistently and repeatedly referred him to ‘statutes’ to clarify the standing that is legal any of these issues, Chaffetz’ frustration was numerous and unhidden.
‘The absence of clarity you share with this body is pretty that is stunnin . . My time has expired, I wish I had about 20 more minutes,’ he noted.
Sanders Endorses Clinton
Because of the email scandal ( at the very least legally) behind her, Hillary Clinton has now gotten the formal nod from her previous nemesis in Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.
‘Secretary Clinton has won the Democratic nomination,’ Sanders said in New Hampshire, standing alongside the former secretary of state and First Lady. ‘I mean to do everything I could to make certain she would be the president that is next of United States.’
Republican nominee Donald Trump countered the announcement by straight away releasing an advertising highlighting the various times Sanders said Clinton had been unfit to be president.
Bush and Obama Unite, for just One Brief Shining Moment
Meanwhile, a moment that is rare of between the political parties emerged on July 12 in Dallas. During a memorial service for the slain police officers ambushed on July 7, President Barack Obama and former President George W. Bush came together in an attempt to honor those killed by a crazed anti-law, anti-white gunman in a sniper attack
Obama told mourners, ‘As Americans, we are able to decide that people like this killer will fail ultimately. They shall not drive us apart. We can decide to come together and also make our country mirror the great we share. inside us, the hopes and simple ambitions’
Before Obama, Bush talked about the selflessness of police officers everywhere.
‘Most of us that is amazing if the moment called for it, we would risk our life to protect a spouse or a child,’ the former president said. ‘Those wearing the uniform assume that danger for the safety of strangers [at all times].’
Further reviews about gun control and also the Black Lives Matter movement throughout the service from Obama received criticism from some segments, but, with numerous saying it had been not the right destination or time and energy to address politically loaded issues.
Pennsylvania Online Gambling Bill Shelved Until Legislature Reconvenes This Autumn
Billionaire and anti-Internet gambling proponent Sheldon Adelson is likely pleased to understand Pennsylvania online gambling will be delayed until at least the fall. (Image: Associated Press/ haaretz.com)
Pennsylvania on line gambling is being pushed apart in Harrisburg until the fall. This is the outcome that is unfortunate iGambling proponents after lawmakers within the Keystone State labored over gambling expansion legislation for the last several months.
At 12:01 am on July 12, Governor Tom Wolf (D) allowed a bipartisan budget plan to become law without their signature. The $31.5 billion spending blueprint will increase paying for education and provide resources to combat the state’s heroin epidemic.
The main issue is how to pay for it. Based on who’s counting, the appropriations bill produces a $1-2 billion shortfall.
Mostly pushed by Republicans within the General Assembly, gambling expansion is seen as one perfect untapped resource that may help pay for the plan. Nevertheless the legislature is anticipated to adjourn for the summer and not reconvene until sometime this autumn.
Gambling on Hold
Led by State Rep. John Payne (R-District 106), the gambling expansion in question would have authorized off-track betting facilities and airports to house slot machines, regulate daily fantasy sports (DFS), and legalize online gambling.
Current casinos that are land-based end up being the only ones permitted to supply Internet gambling. Licenses were expected to price operators $8 million, with gross gaming revenues taxed at 16 %.
‘Regulating and taxing interactive gaming in Pennsylvania is a viable option that will benefit the state and our communities,’ Payne said in late June. ‘we must consider revolutionary revenue sources to fill our budget shortfall and keep our public pension system solvent. before we ask the taxpayers to fork over more of the hard-earned money,’
Gambling certainly won’t over come the gap that is billion-dollar however it would help.
Lawmakers estimate $100 million will be created for Harrisburg in the first 12 months alone mostly due to upfront certification fees. That means five to ten percent regarding the budget gap could be solved through gambling expansion.
State leaders may also be targeting an extra $1 tax on each pack of cigarettes offered, imposing a six tax that is percent digital entertainment downloads, and overhauling the state-run wine industry to allow private merchants to enter the market.
Spend Now, Spend Later
Anyone with a credit card knows how important it’s to pay on time. Unfortunately for residents in Pennsylvania, their elected leaders aren’t as financially versed.
State Sen. Pat Browne (R-District 16), chairman of their state’s Senate Appropriations Committee, says action will be forthcoming.
‘One hundred million bucks into the scope of a $31.5 billion budget . . . it’s not needed right away,’ Browne told the Philadelphia Inquirer. The Lehigh County senator included, nevertheless, that the odds of online gambling being reconsidered this fall are ‘probable.’
Wolf was justly upset that the General Assembly did not send him a way that is calculated pay for its budget.
‘The General Assembly has a constitutional duty to pass a sustainable revenue package to buy what they want to spend,’ Wolf stated this week. ‘We owe it to taxpayers, our kids, seniors, and our many vulnerable to bring this across the finish line.’
Quebec ISP Blocking Challenged by Federal Consumer Rights Group
Quebec’s plan to block online gambling internet site faces a challenge that it’s in direct conflict with federal law. (Image: gamingintelligence.com)
Quebec’s plans to force ISP’s to block access to unlicensed gambling is being put to the test by a federal consumer rights group. The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) this week filed an objection up to a legislation, passed by the Quebec legislature earlier in the year, which aims to disconnect 8.2 million residents from the unregulated markets.
The bill’s supporters claim that its aim is to ‘improve public wellness’ by forcing state residents to play on Quebec’s sole regulated online gaming site, Lotto-Quebec’s Espace-jeux.
But critics, which include net neutrality advocates, technology lawyers, and the ISPs themselves, have accused the Quebec government of setting a dangerous precedent by putting commercial gain above the freedom associated with the internet. The plans, which were used in bondibet casino instant play the provinces March 2015 budget anticipate the scheme will boost federal government revenues by $13.5 million in 2016-2017 and $27 million in subsequent years.
Cost to Consumers
These gains will come at the huge expense of ISP companies, that have said that the interruption to their infrastructures is enormous as they might have to redesign their companies from the ground up. The expense of this could be passed onto consumers.
The PIAC filing states that Quebec is in direct conflict with the1993 Federal Telecommunications Act, which prohibits a communications provider from ‘control[ing] the information or influence[ing] this is or purpose of telecommunications carried unless it has approval from the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission by it for the public.